Universal student allowance

So the Labour government is looking at putting in a universal student allowance.

This was obviously coming for a while now. I have no doubt that many people will see this as a political football – with parties just looking at getting through popularist policies that get them votes, but … I agree with it.

Why do students have to borrow to live, when the rest of society gets some security net? It never made sense to me.

I would prefer if this policy was implemented with other policies focused at integrating education, employment, and welfare policy (see here) and I would also prefer it if the government was clear about what sort of cuts to other services they will provide to fund the student allowance (as in the long-run it will be more expensive) – but I’m not diametrically opposed to the idea.

Fundamentally, as long as we see the unemployment benefit as a security net for members of society, it should be available for everyone (who is not employed) – and that is what this policy does.

Now, tell me why you disagree 😉

Update: Kiwiblog (*), the Inquiring Mind, No right turn, and the Standard discuss the issue.

Tax credit for R&D: What’s the point?

So in National’s tax package they have dumped the R&D tax credit. Businesses seem disappointed – but this isn’t enough information in of itself to tell me whether getting rid of the credit is socially optimal or not.

In order to analyse this we have to think about why an R&D tax credit could be socially optimal and then see whether that scheme actually worked in the appropriate way to increase social welfare.

Let’s give this a go 😉

Read more

Depression contract

Intrade has launched a US depression contract (ht Institutional economics).

This depression is defined as:

a cumulative decline in GDP of more than 10.0% over four consecutive quarters

Do you think NZ’s very own iPredict would like to make up a similar contract for NZ?

Deposit insurance: Was it necessary in NZ

We have Deposit insurance in NZ now.

I’m not sure. Even if it is the right thing to have (as Bernard Hickey on the Rates Blog suggests) I still fear that this sort of action leads to a signaling problem.

The act of committing to deposit insurance could suggest to people overseas that our banking system is also in meltdown. Fundamentally, people assume that the government may have some information that they do not. To external people our banks look safe, but seeing the fact that the NZ government has come in to offer an insurance scheme to banks may shake this view. This type of signaling issues is probably one of the reasons why the RBNZ didn’t cut rates a few days back.

I’m just a little uneasy, and I’m not sure why – I blame my educations focus on signaling models 😉

I’ll read the details and comment later tonight – if you want to comment now, yell at me in the comments section of this post 😉

Update: Good article by David Hargreaves. Note:

The decision by the Australian government (and let’s say that it WAS their decision) suggests a nervousness about the position of the Australian banks that hasn’t been indicated before. And that’s not a comforting thing.

Hmmmm

Update 2: Forget about risk – the government will pay for it.  Hmmmm.

DOW 8500, BDI down 79%, WTF

Or so says two of the blogs I often read for US economic information:

Market Movers (*)

The Big Picture (*)

I have to concur.

However, for New Zealand there is a big plus to this collapse in US economic activity – the huge capacity constraints on shipping have lifted (Market Movers).

Shipping costs have been restrictively high for our exporters for a long time. A fall off in import activity to the US has freed up ships, which leads to much lower shipping costs for our exporters. Add to this the lower exchange rate and our tradable sector is getting one hell of a boost moving forward.

Update:  Dow breaks 8,000 on the downside.

Warehouse Extra is gone : Part 2

For those of you don’t read stuff.co.nz while they should be working, there are some really interesting tidbits on the latest article about the Warehouse pahsing out the extra concept.

It expected an annualised pre-tax improvement in trading earnings of about $9 million.

i.e. the extra concept has been hemorrhaging money!

Mr Morrice said it was the failure of the hoped-for halo effect – where grocery shoppers also bought general merchandise – that was the main reason for Extra’s dumping.

This has been Matt’s pet topic during this saga (posts here and here). The killer for the halo effect, and the reason why I’ve always believed the Extra concept would fail unless a supermarket owned the warehouse is summed up nicely by Tony Carter from Foodstuffs

“Clearly they did not have the scale”

and Mary Smith of Auckland

“I don’t come here that often. I find their prices expensive compared to the other supermarkets.”

Agnitio