Another reason why we miss Friedman

Here.  If he was around to push the policy debate maybe we wouldn’t be in this much of a mess.

On that note, people who know nothing about economics or the allocation of resources more generally like to demonise Friedman – this is nonsensical.  The guy pushed for a negative income tax/minimum income level, he wanted us to accurately respond to the trade-off’s inherent in monetary policy, and he wanted to improve institutional structures to help protect individuals.  People like Naomi Klein who turn around and try to treat him like the bad guy of the past 60 years are living in a fantasy world.

Why the US is looking increasingly like Japan

I genuinely can’t believe the things I’m reading.

If they said that the current slump was solely down to supply side factors then their position would be coherent.  But instead the argument is that, when we are in a liquidity trap, we should just ride it out.

In terms of the literature, using higher inflation in the future to escape a liquidity trap now is accepted … at least that was my interpretation.  However, policy makers in the US don’t care – just like they didn’t in Japan for a long time (and counting).  Lets hope the policy failure doesn’t end up as costly in the current case.

A point on inflation for all of us to remember

From the always excellent Money Illusion blog:

The key point is that if the Fed pays attention to inflation at all, it should be increases in the price of stuff built with American labor.  They shouldn’t care about the inflation rate that matches some mythical “cost of living,” as the Fed can’t do anything about adverse supply shocks.

In a small open economy like New Zealand we are constantly peppered by supply shocks.  In such an environment what the RBNZ “should” and “can” be doing is very different to targeting the “cost of living” – which is truly set by real economy factors.

A lot of people in NZ get confused, and think that the RBNZ sets the cost of living – this is a myth that comes from, IMO, poor explanations by economists regarding what inflation is and why we should target it.  This myth needs to be dispelled.

We have discussed this all before in the “inflation debate“, specifically with regards to what is inflation here and what are the costs here.

Off topic: Wellington Phoenix football club changes ownership

This is a Wellington blog that is written by economists who also really enjoy the football.  As a result, given the recent big news regarding our local football club, I have to say something 😉

Terry has given up the A-league license of the Phoenix given the difficulties he is currently facing – and it has been picked up by a consortium of Wellington businessmen.  These businessmen are all in good financial shape, and have committed to a five year plan for the club (hopefully one that is more successful than the original version of a five year plan 😉 )

There are a few things I’d like us to keep in mind here:

  • This change will increase certainty, and improve the stability of the club – this is great.
  • It is a bit late in the day to expect big things this season – so lets just get behind the team, and enjoy the football, even if we are losing.
  • Terry founded the club and did a hell of a lot of getting football moving in Wellington – and we should recognise that.  If possible recognise it with a comment here.
  • Hopefully games will be more fully advertised, so people will know when they can head along.  I’m hoping to see more of you fine people out there.

Why I’m in a bad mood

Agnitio asked me what has been going on recently, as I was complaining its a mess.  I emailed him my summary, so I thought I’d also put them down here:

The ECB announced that its going to accept some things as collateral – but dump others.  Leaving markets confused about what the hell was going on, and what it means for sovereign debt purchases.

The US followed this up by saying that they would buy a smaller amount of long-term debt than forecast, sell short-term debt, and flatten the yield curve.  They say it will be stimulatory because NK models say so – however, a flat yield curve is a bit dodgy, given that it’s formed by expectations of either weak growth or weak inflation in the future.  In essence NK models say “get the long-run real interest rate down as much as possible” which you do by increasing inflation expectations, not nominal rates – so markets collapsed after that.

US government decided to get involved by refusing to extend the debt limit AGAIN, if they can’t make up by Sep 30 the US will default.

Then the European commission decided that it was a good time to say they were going to introduce a financial transactions tax – just when financial markets are panicking – and for good measure they said they hadn’t figured out what level it would be at, or what would be taxed yet, just to add to uncertainty.

While all this is happening Italy and Greece have continued to say they’ll get their fiscal situation in order – but they keep delaying introducing actual policies.  Given Greece is effectively insolvent, the dithering by them, other European governments, and the ECB, makes it unclear who holds the liability the entire European financial system is at a stand still.  Given the exposure of Australian banks to this, we have seen funding costs rise considerably (luckily no-one in NZ is actually borrowing anything).

With Europe having fluffed around while the crisis has been in full swing over the past 2 months, purchases from China have pulled back, seeing activity there slow as well.  A slowdown in China will have the impact of lowering our export prices.

Party.

This mix of awesome factors has seen the cost of insuring against default in Australian banks increase to within a whisker of their Lehman Brother peaks.  It has seen uncertainty measures push at new highs.

Unlike the Lehman Brother’s collapse there is no reason for these indicators to be high solely based on the financial fundamentals – the debt burden, and who holds what, is known.  However, while policy makers were trying to improve outcomes during the crisis in 2008, they seem more interested in trying to cause a crisis this time around.

The EU needs to get its priorities straight

Seriously.  These guys have been fluffing around for so long that the entire financial system is in a panic.  So they decide its a good time to announce they are going to start taxing financial transactions – but they haven’t decided the level yet or the full scope yet.

Is Europe’s motto, during times of uncertainty add more uncertainty?  This is ridiculous.

If we have another financial crisis here, the blame mainly falls on the politicial systems in Europe (and to a lesser extent the US).  When everything I try to say to people regarding the outlook for the economy is conditional on politicians being sane, its hard to really believe that what I’m saying is damned right.

FYI, I’m against a Tobin tax.  At some point this deserves a fuller post, I have a couple of little guys sitting around here and here and here  though.