Japan’s hole, the US hole, our hole?

I just took a peak at an interesting Business Week article from March 2006 called “How Japan fell into the Hole“.

The key message for me was this:

This shift to debt minimization, however, completely disrupts the normal workings of the economy. That’s because the corporate sector no longer borrows the funds saved by the household sector, even at ultra-low interest rates. With no one borrowing, those personal savings — plus the debt companies are repaying — pile up unused in the banks, effectively shrinking aggregate demand by the same amount. Left unattended, this deflationary gap will continue to shrink the economy until almost everyone becomes too poor to save any money.

In order for the disruption to become severe, we need reserves to be built up – money will need to be hid under pillows.  In this case, if the government can get hold these resources and put them to use (or say, if people are only willing to lend to government because of a substantially negative economic outlook) we avoid the paradox of thrift.

Fundamentally, for our demand deficiency to really get kicking, we need one of our prices (interest rates) to get “stuck” at a level which is “too high” leading to excess savings.  We are seeing a similar situation in the US, the question is – will we run into the same thing here in little old NZ?

Fed cuts to zero

Well well well, the Fed has decided to actually set its cash rate target at a range of 0-25bps.

Note:

The focus of the Committee’s policy going forward will be to support the functioning of financial markets and stimulate the economy through open market operations and other measures that sustain the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet at a high level

I suppose we can see the Federal Reserve jumping into the Treasuries market and getting deeper into mortgage backed securities.

the Federal Reserve will also implement the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to facilitate the extension of credit to households and small businesses

Looks like the Fed is taking its role as lender of last resort to heart 😉

September GDP preview

So on Christmas eve we get a special present – confirmation that we have so far had a three quarter recession 🙁

The main market in town, iPredict, is spot on with the 95% pick for a negative GDP quarter.

Let us discuss 🙂 :
Read more

We have moved …

Our address is now http://www.tvhe.co.nz (note that it was previously http://tvhe.wordpress.com)

The new RSS feed is at http://www.tvhe.co.nz/feed/ or you can automatically subscribe with the links on the right.

Update your blogrolls, feeds, bookmarks, and other stuff 🙂

The temporary redundancy package

So National got in, and as a result it is their redundancy package that has passed into law (as opposed to the Labour one).

I am still not happy that we are running a redundancy package now and not in normal economic times. Why are people that are made redundant now any more deserving of an additional government handout than people who are made redundant in normal economic times?

Sure we can state that it is “harder” for people to get work during a recession, so it is more likely that the redundant person is genuinely unemployed rather than “lazy” – but I just don’t buy that.

I do not think this policy is solving any market failure, and as a piece of fairness legislation I am not sure if it is all that fair.  Luckily, its not particularly expensive anyway, so there is little chance of a massive government failure, unless … we don’t have mass unemployment, only a structural change in where labour is most highly valued.  In this case, the redundancy payment will prevent the transition between industries, and lead to a longer, more painful, adjustment process for the New Zealand economy.

So do we think that the construction industry needs to be smaller while there are other industries (say exporters) who are now desperate for labour?  Or will the global recession cause genuine involuntary unemployment?