Benefit policy: Give me a value judgment

I have avoided discussing Nationals benefit policy so far. I just haven’t seen any need given that I like to stay relatively apolitical – and also given that it does not imply much of a change from the status quo (do you guys know how difficult it is to renew your benefit anyway nowadays!).

For anyone that does want to see the partisan discussion we have:

Kiwiblog links, The Standard links, No Right Turn.

However, I’m low on things to write about, so when Kiwiblog linked to this article in The Press, I thought I would form some value based argument on the first line of the article (it is not necessarily my beliefs – just an argument against the first line) – then we can discuss what value judgments I’m making etc in the comments.

So the first line is.

Read more

New Zealand dollar in decline

Source (NBNZ)

Damn, I wish I had picked up this graph yesterday – as the 24 July was when the RBNZ cut the OCR, which made the TWI fall by about 100 basis points.

So since then, our exchange rate has slide a further 200 basis points. For people that prefer thinking of it in US$ terms, we have fallen from $0.77US per NZ$ to $0.70 (including a little time under $0.69US!)

Why the hell is this happening?

Update: The rebound in the dollar was bound to happen this morning following this post and the fact that other commentators have said the dollar would keep falling – it is the “curse of the forecast” after all 😛 – luckily the below discussion is about the general factors driving a decline, rather than a next day forecast 😉

Read more

And we’re concerned about our housing market!

Now that Quotable Value is telling us the New Zealand house prices are finally falling (down 2.2% on a year earlier in July), the reality has sunk in that this might be a long adjustment.

However, the downturn in the US housing market has been happening a lot longer, and shows no sign of abating.  Especially with some houses now selling for $499US! (ht Stackelberg Follower)

Cross-country cash rates

In the Financial Times, Martin Feldstein wrote about the difference between the EU and US monetary setting regimes – specifically he wanted to answer why the EU was lifting rates, while the US had been cutting. (ht Greg Mankiw).

Ultimately, he puts this difference down to a number of factors:

Read more

Specialization: Policy and morality

Philosophy et certa links to an interesting paper by Richard Sharvy titled “Who’s to say what’s right or wrong?  People who have PHDs in philosophy, that’s who”.

At some level this makes sense – philosophers (can) specialise in the study of ethics and morality, and as a result of this training they will have a better idea of what is “right or wrong”, and why it is so, then other people.  My impression of “rightness” and “wrongness” is that it is subjective – deciding what is wrong involves making moral judgments.

As a result, if we accept this, then when forming policy it is Philosophers that should be the ones forming the subjective value judgments required to qualify what the appropriate policy is.

The job of economists is to describe – we have to objectively describe what happens to a bunch of variables in society when one of them is moved.  However, if Philosophers are the experts when in comes to value judgments – they should be the ones that place a values on different variables, so when the economists model moves it can come to some sort of conclusion.

What do you guys think?  How do other disciplines fit into the policy creation process?

Where is economics on the political spectrum?

There seems to be a lot of discussion surrounding economists position on the political spectrum. My answer to this would be that economists are not a political group or a club so economists themselves will be spread over the political spectrum.

However, I have to admit that the process used when discussing economic issues does lend itself (or suits people would already think like it) to a specific way of thinking. As a result, I’m going to discuss where I THINK my own views stand using the definitions of wikipedia. As I am not a political scientist this discussion will be quite useless – so if any political experts would like to help me out in figuring out where my views lie, please give it a go in the comments section.

Ok here we go.

Read more